It is clear that in America, we do not take a preventative approach to our health. Rather than use precaution and limit the use of materials that may pose a risk to our health, we mass produce products and insist they are safe until proven otherwise. Essentially, we are using ourselves and our children as experimental animals. If enough of us get sick and the research can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that a certain chemical, additive, heavy metal, or otherwise profitiable product is to blame, then steps will be taken to limit its production and use. But only after years of research and unnecessary suffering and/or death have occurred first. This was the case with tobacco, asbestos, benzene, and vinyl chloride, just to name a few, and will it possibly be the case with things like BPA, phthalates, brominated fire retardants, PFOA (non-stick chemicals used in cookware, clothing, and carpets), pesticides, and cell phones?
I am currently reading The Secret History of the War on Cancer, written by Devra Davis, Ph.D. She has a great page that summarizes what is wrong with our current approach in America that I’d like to quote here:
“If we insist that we cannot act to prevent future harm until we have proof of past harms, we are treating people like lab rats in uncontrolled experiments. If we say, let’s let the experts decide, where do we get experts without baggage? The costs of experimental laboratory research are growing and debates about the value of various research methods are becoming ever more complex. These debates are sometimes fueled by those who have a knack for turning molehills of scientific minutiae into mountains of uncertainty. In a world where information on the health and safety of workers remains locked up in company files, wrapped in the protections of confidentiality, independent experts to make sense of it are an endangered species. Continue reading →